In my new Architecture and life cycle thinking course, one of the assignments was for students to review two published documents on buildings related carbon, and compare and contrast them and see how the two documents could complement each other. The two documents were CGBC’s zero carbon building standard and your article on embodied carbon of 1007 buildings (not the full report). One of the tasks was for students to map what is covered and where from A1-D perspective.
With this update of CGBC’s standard, such comparison would be less interesting come next year when I will be teaching the course for the second time given the standard is full A1-C4 now 