# CLT (kgCO2/m3) similar to CONCRETE (kgCO2/m3) ¿why?

**URL:** <https://community.carbonleadershipforum.org/t/clt-kgco2-m3-similar-to-concrete-kgco2-m3-why/5332>\
**Category:** Materials\
**Tags:** concrete, co2, clt\
**Created:** [May 10, 2022, 10:50am UTC](https://community.carbonleadershipforum.org/t/clt-kgco2-m3-similar-to-concrete-kgco2-m3-why/5332 "2022-05-10T10:50:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xramon](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/community.carbonleadershipforum.org/xramon/32/245_2.png) [@xramon](https://community.carbonleadershipforum.org/u/xramon)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2022, 4:05pm UTC](https://community.carbonleadershipforum.org/t/clt-kgco2-m3-similar-to-concrete-kgco2-m3-why/5332/7 "2022-05-19T16:05:48Z")

</div>

Thanks also @mr329 ! the report you shared has been quite interesting! Stora Henso “wins” again if we compare the results, one main reason I see could be because of the mixture of renewable and non-renewable primary energy quoted by each manufacturer (including renewable energy from burning waste wood on-site)… it’s a pity we cannot see the energy/m3 of CLT panels which could have been useful for comparison!

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.carbonleadershipforum.org/t/clt-kgco2-m3-similar-to-concrete-kgco2-m3-why/5332)._