P.S. not to emphasize the contrasting viewpoints, but I don’t think we can ignore them either. Compare, for example, the largely anti-wood/forestry views expressed in this article and this sign-on letter that are held by many “non-centrist” ENGOs and forest activists with the views reflected in the CEO principles and bizillions of webinars, publications, etc. that are pro-wood/forestry – in many cases with few qualifications or “guardrails”. Both sides cite (competing) science that supports their positions. It will not be easy to bridge this gap since in some cases we will probably be looking at a binary choice – this or that – but we can and should try!