Dave Tenny: "Hi, Cliff - for the benefit of the group, could you share which individuals support your draft principles? Thanks."
We didn’t canvas “support” although I would say the whole group was generally supportive of the Context and Vision but they did not want to hold things up getting full approval from their organizations given that this was just a draft.
I have asked individuals if they would like to respond but haven’t heard back from all yet. Obviously Jason Grant started the discussion for this group and all the other groups but hasn’t weighed in on this version.
Valerie Langer
Brad Kahn
Cliff Wallis
were on the drafting group and are on the record supporting the context and vision.
To be clear about the “using progressively fewer wood products discussion”, that was not something that there was consensus on. In the interests of transparency and a fuller discussion, it was included above but is not part of the Context and Vision.
It is my distinct impression that there is good support, even if not yet explicitly stated, around the current wording/concepts in the Context and Vision but I will let those working on this weigh in directly or I will add as I hear back from them.
We thought it was important to post this now even if it wasn’t fully formed as we all saw it as a reasonable draft set of ideas that could continue to be discussed and worked on through and beyond the Summit.