How Can I Use Embodied Carbon Data to Improve the Accuracy of 'What State Am I In Right Now on a Map' Tools?

I’ve been exploring tools that help identify “what state am i in right now on a map” and I’m curious about how this can intersect with efforts to reduce embodied carbon in the built environment. These tools typically use GPS and geolocation data to pinpoint a user’s exact location, which is essential for various applications, from navigation to localized information services.

While using these tools, I started thinking about the broader environmental impact of the infrastructure they rely on, particularly the data centers, satellites, and communication networks that support geolocation services. Given the Carbon Leadership Forum’s focus on reducing carbon emissions, I’m wondering if there’s a way to incorporate embodied carbon considerations into the design, use, or optimization of such tools.

For instance, could the materials used in the physical infrastructure supporting geolocation services be optimized to reduce embodied carbon? Are there ongoing discussions or studies within the Carbon Leadership Forum community that look at the carbon footprint of digital infrastructure, including the servers and data centers that process geolocation data? If so, how can these insights be applied to improve the environmental sustainability of tools like “what state am I in right now on a map”?

Additionally, I’m interested in understanding how life cycle assessments (LCAs) could be utilized to measure the embodied carbon associated with the entire ecosystem of digital tools, including those used for mapping and location services. Could the principles of sustainable construction and low-carbon material selection be extended to the development and maintenance of digital infrastructure?

I would appreciate insights from anyone in the community who has experience or knowledge in this area. It would be helpful to know if there are specific metrics or methodologies used to assess the carbon footprint of such digital services and whether there are any existing case studies or examples where low-carbon strategies have been successfully integrated into the digital infrastructure supporting location-based tools.

Finally, I’m curious about potential policy implications. Could there be a push for more stringent regulations on the carbon impact of digital infrastructure, similar to those we see in building codes and construction standards? How might these regulations influence the development of future geolocation tools?

I look forward to hearing thoughts and experiences from others in the community!

Hi Albin,

Lots of good questions!

I have a partial answer for one of them, as it relates to studies of the carbon footprint of digital infrastructure. One of my colleagues published this report that looked at the Embodied Carbon of Data Centers. A key note - while we might think that the embodied carbon for structures and enclosures still isnt good enough, it’s still leagues ahead of where the data is for Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing systems. That’s a challenge, especially since data centers have a LOT of electrical and mechanical systems…